<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Frame Sequential 3D?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/</link>
	<description>Latest 3D TV news, reviews and comparisons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:02:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 22:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-3dtvs.com/?p=607#comment-164</guid>
		<description>HDMI 1.4a Spec/Standard for HDTVs was done with mandatory of 3D formats.  Find it and see what actually CE vendors must have  manufactured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HDMI 1.4a Spec/Standard for HDTVs was done with mandatory of 3D formats.  Find it and see what actually CE vendors must have  manufactured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best3DTV</title>
		<link>http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Best3DTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-3dtvs.com/?p=607#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,
  I don&#039;t think I&#039;d be the best person to advise you on 3D content creation. However, I&#039;d certainly be glad to point you in the right direction. Have you tried the 3D Yahoo Group?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/3dtv/join

Excellent group, with some very knowledgeable folk including a few industry veterans. Feel free to post your question there and I&#039;m sure that someone on the group should be able to give you a much better answer than anything I could come up with =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,<br />
  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be the best person to advise you on 3D content creation. However, I&#8217;d certainly be glad to point you in the right direction. Have you tried the 3D Yahoo Group?</p>
<p><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/3dtv/join" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/3dtv/join</a></p>
<p>Excellent group, with some very knowledgeable folk including a few industry veterans. Feel free to post your question there and I&#8217;m sure that someone on the group should be able to give you a much better answer than anything I could come up with =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-3dtvs.com/?p=607#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info!

I am looking for info on how to create 3D animation for the Panasonic screens (or other brands)
I already make 3D for autostereoscopic screens and really would like to try to make images for those new screens!
Is there a special codec to use ?
It seems that it have to be 60fps for a frame sequencial, am I right?

thanks for your help

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info!</p>
<p>I am looking for info on how to create 3D animation for the Panasonic screens (or other brands)<br />
I already make 3D for autostereoscopic screens and really would like to try to make images for those new screens!<br />
Is there a special codec to use ?<br />
It seems that it have to be 60fps for a frame sequencial, am I right?</p>
<p>thanks for your help</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best3DTV</title>
		<link>http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Best3DTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-3dtvs.com/?p=607#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Richard,

  While you are indeed correct in that there is no specific reason that television sets needed to be 60Hz or 120Hz back in the day, the truth is that 60Hz at 30fps for 3D wouldn&#039;t work as well. While the video itself would display correctly, due to the nature of the active shutter glasses, a 1/30 second shuttering per eye (for a 60Hz 3D Display) would be too jarring and noticable, leading to flickering and a poor viewing experience.

Of course, that is independent of the actual ability of the TV to display the content, but is more a limitation imposed by active shutter technology. Historically, the different framerates chosen by different media/countries has made the whole framerate system a bit messy. It certainly would be ideal if everyone could agree on a single FPS so that we wouldn&#039;t have to worry about uneven pulldown and judder associated with incompatible display refresh rates.

As mentioned in our Panasonic Plasma 3D TV reviews, the new panasonics had to also be modified to handle 120Hz. This was purely for the sake of active shutter to work, as Plasma TVs don&#039;t inherently need the bump to 120Hz refresh rates for ghosting, etc due to the ultra-fast response time of plasma panels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>  While you are indeed correct in that there is no specific reason that television sets needed to be 60Hz or 120Hz back in the day, the truth is that 60Hz at 30fps for 3D wouldn&#8217;t work as well. While the video itself would display correctly, due to the nature of the active shutter glasses, a 1/30 second shuttering per eye (for a 60Hz 3D Display) would be too jarring and noticable, leading to flickering and a poor viewing experience.</p>
<p>Of course, that is independent of the actual ability of the TV to display the content, but is more a limitation imposed by active shutter technology. Historically, the different framerates chosen by different media/countries has made the whole framerate system a bit messy. It certainly would be ideal if everyone could agree on a single FPS so that we wouldn&#8217;t have to worry about uneven pulldown and judder associated with incompatible display refresh rates.</p>
<p>As mentioned in our Panasonic Plasma 3D TV reviews, the new panasonics had to also be modified to handle 120Hz. This was purely for the sake of active shutter to work, as Plasma TVs don&#8217;t inherently need the bump to 120Hz refresh rates for ghosting, etc due to the ultra-fast response time of plasma panels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Briscoe</title>
		<link>http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Briscoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-3dtvs.com/?p=607#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply, it&#039;s rather as I thought. I take your point about the lack of a set stndard, I was really thinking of the frame sequential format rather than side by side. 
The thought behind my question is that there is really no fundamental reason why a 3d tv should have to be 120Hz. The systems currently available have been configured thus - the glasses only operate at 120Hz as I understand it - but a 60Hz set delivering 30fps to each eye would in theory still be better than movie film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply, it&#8217;s rather as I thought. I take your point about the lack of a set stndard, I was really thinking of the frame sequential format rather than side by side.<br />
The thought behind my question is that there is really no fundamental reason why a 3d tv should have to be 120Hz. The systems currently available have been configured thus &#8211; the glasses only operate at 120Hz as I understand it &#8211; but a 60Hz set delivering 30fps to each eye would in theory still be better than movie film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best3DTV</title>
		<link>http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Best3DTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-3dtvs.com/?p=607#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hey Richard,
That is a great question. Unfortunately, many of the specifications that will be used for 3D broadcasts are still not set in stone. However, I should clarify one important thing. 60fps is &lt;strong&gt;not necessary&lt;/strong&gt; for smooth viewing. If that were the case, you and I could never enjoy any of the Hollywood movies in the cinemas or when watching Blu-ray discs.

This is because Hollywood still uses 24fps for shooting movies, and that works perfectly fine for the most part. Blu-Ray 3D will mostly utilize frame sequential 1080p at 24fps, that is 24 frames for each eye, or 48 total frames at 1080p. This should provide excellent quality.

When it comes to 3D broadcasts, depending on how you are getting your video, you might be bandwidth or cablebox limited. There are techniques such as &quot;Side by Side&quot; 3D, where the left and right eye image is squeezed into a single 1080 or 720 frame, and then processes and separated out by the TV. It does halve the horizontal resolution of the image but initial tests by ESPN with 720p side-by-side content at 60fps has gotten very positive feedback.

We&#039;ll have to wait and watch a bit to see what framerate and specifications 3D content providers go with, but for the most part, you don&#039;t have to worry too much about it as all the 3D TVs should be able to process these different specifications and display it correctly on the TV screen.

I will be including a couple of articles on the different frame packing and display methods that are going to be incorporated in 3D displays. So stay tuned! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Richard,<br />
That is a great question. Unfortunately, many of the specifications that will be used for 3D broadcasts are still not set in stone. However, I should clarify one important thing. 60fps is <strong>not necessary</strong> for smooth viewing. If that were the case, you and I could never enjoy any of the Hollywood movies in the cinemas or when watching Blu-ray discs.</p>
<p>This is because Hollywood still uses 24fps for shooting movies, and that works perfectly fine for the most part. Blu-Ray 3D will mostly utilize frame sequential 1080p at 24fps, that is 24 frames for each eye, or 48 total frames at 1080p. This should provide excellent quality.</p>
<p>When it comes to 3D broadcasts, depending on how you are getting your video, you might be bandwidth or cablebox limited. There are techniques such as &#8220;Side by Side&#8221; 3D, where the left and right eye image is squeezed into a single 1080 or 720 frame, and then processes and separated out by the TV. It does halve the horizontal resolution of the image but initial tests by ESPN with 720p side-by-side content at 60fps has gotten very positive feedback.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll have to wait and watch a bit to see what framerate and specifications 3D content providers go with, but for the most part, you don&#8217;t have to worry too much about it as all the 3D TVs should be able to process these different specifications and display it correctly on the TV screen.</p>
<p>I will be including a couple of articles on the different frame packing and display methods that are going to be incorporated in 3D displays. So stay tuned! <img src='http://3dtvscdn.3dtvs.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Briscoe</title>
		<link>http://www.best-3dtvs.com/what-is-frame-sequential-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Briscoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.best-3dtvs.com/?p=607#comment-16</guid>
		<description>We are told that 3d tv&#039;s are all 120Hz so that each eye will receive 60 frames per second. As only 60 full frames can currently be transmitted per second, does this not mean that each eye is only truly seeing 30 distinct frames, with the other 30 being interpolations ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are told that 3d tv&#8217;s are all 120Hz so that each eye will receive 60 frames per second. As only 60 full frames can currently be transmitted per second, does this not mean that each eye is only truly seeing 30 distinct frames, with the other 30 being interpolations ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Content Delivery Network via 3dtvscdn.3dtvs.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.best-3dtvs.com @ 2012-02-04 18:25:36 -->
